• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Noulakaz

The blog of Avinash, Christina, Anya and Kyan Meetoo.

  • Home
  • About
  • People
    • Christina & Avinash Meetoo
    • Avinash Meetoo
    • Christina Meetoo
    • Anya Meetoo
    • Kyan Meetoo
  • General
    • News
    • Mauritius
    • Politics
    • Education
    • Business
    • Travel
  • Computing
    • Apple
    • Linux
    • LUGM
    • Programming
    • Web
    • Technology
    • Knowledge Seven
  • Entertainment
    • Music
    • Movies
    • Photography
    • Sports

There is no need for a parliament

29 January 2012 By Avinash Meetoo 16 Comments

Everyone in Mauritius is talking about electoral reforms right now, more precisely Rama Sithanen’s proposal for a dose of proportionality as well as the best loser system.

I was thinking about something today. Our population in Mauritius is more than 1 million. Our Parliament, because of its physical dimensions and practices set up by some Englishmen decades ago, is limited to around 80 members i.e. 0.0067% of the population.

Is it normal that 0.0067% of the population decide for 1,200,000 people? Is that fair or logical in the era of the Internet and Social Networks?

 

On Facebook for example, one can set up a poll and get hundred of votes in less that 1h (easily more that the 80 people we have in our Parliament). Now, one can argue that the 80 members of Parliament are more honest and more knowledgeable that the 1,199,920 others but we all know that’s a bag of crap! They are not more honest or knowledgeable that the rest of us…

A few years ago, I set up Ideas to make Mauritius better! and, for some time, it worked pretty well. The system, as used by Barack Obama during his first campaign, allows people to submit proposals which are then upvoted / downvoted by others. In the end, only the most worthwhile proposals prevail. Civil servants are then responsible to implement these proposals.

Can this type of absolute democracy exist? One where the whole population decides and civil servants implement without any need for any middlemen?

Seems utopic? What do you think?

Filed Under: Education, Mauritius, News, Politics

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Jean Gray says

    29 January 2012 at 22:30

    With corruption prevailing in out country, i’ll not be surprised that the idea or ideas came from a political leader and is passed down to the commons of that same political party then in turn voted by the people adhering to that same party and accepted by a higher up, the very same political leader. They’d go to all this trouble to make it look like “Le peuple a decidé et le peuple a voté.” While, the idea might be the long awaited solution to the betterment of Mauritius it might also be another attempt to make money off our heads.

  2. fluxy says

    29 January 2012 at 22:43

    Been thinking about it. I guess it’s not up to the 80 members alone, there are other players who make the whole “democracy” thing work – members of the press, public sector workers (workers talk to their heads, heads to their superiors up to the top), private investors, consumers (with their money), worker and other types of unions, amongst others. That’s ideally. Now with politicians trying to muscle out others, with diverse tactics, public sector workers having their voices stifled, private monopolies etc, the whole game gets spoiled.

    I do wonder if there is any way out. Like a way to fit public memorandums somewhere for uber important decisions.

    All in all, given the challenges to stay alive (cost of living, transport issues, internet/communication costs, water problems…), I am afraid it is tough to find a spot on my agenda for a new political system. Sad, but true.

  3. Adarsh Hasnah says

    30 January 2012 at 09:44

    Its not utopic…in fact there is a country in the world where such type of democracy exist, also known as direct democracy (well not exactly votes on facebook…). You can always have a look at the political system in the Switzerland and ask yourself why our political reform cannot be like this, one that is truly democratic and in which the citizen have a say…

  4. Avinash Meetoo says

    30 January 2012 at 10:03

    Very interesting, Adarsh.

    I was not aware that Direct Democracy is already a reality in Switzerland and, for some cases, in the United States.

  5. Pramod says

    30 January 2012 at 12:08

    Those in the government would not be willing to do this since for them it will be a loss of power in the sense that the decision is left fully on the citizens where it might not be fully agreeable to those in power. The fear of losing power will prevent this evolution since most of those in politics are only concerned about their power and profits / advantage.

  6. Adarsh Hasnah says

    30 January 2012 at 13:41

    Well, if i am not wrong, in Switzerland, direct democracy became a reality after a revolution by the citizens…

  7. Patrick Ng says

    1 February 2012 at 18:45

    Well, if i am not wrong, in Switzerland, direct democracy became a reality after a revolution by the citizens…

    That does not suprise me. Those whose interests are in danger will do everything they can to protect these interests.

  8. Clever Dodo says

    12 February 2012 at 08:42

    Too many powerful people are involved in corrupting the system and this has been going on for a long time now that citizens have gotten used to the idea that there’s nothing that we can actually do. Those citizens who want to raise their voices are threatened or bought out. Remember that guy who was working at the airport and had to flee to Canada with his family because of death threats when he tried to stop the nonsense that was happening there? Or the anti-corruption unit that can never get to the bottom of major corruption cases because they work alongside politicians.

    It ain’t gonna happen because we’re never going to get a significant number of people to start off a revolution and see it through.

  9. Avinash Meetoo says

    12 February 2012 at 12:15

    Never? I am not too sure :-)

  10. hansley says

    19 February 2012 at 08:19

    Well, we have issues:- the main one being the multiculturalism prevalent has made a number of ‘communities’ sensitive to their representation. This is a fact and ultimately we will have to work with this parameter. The BSL is an explicit way to represent this based on an old census. New methods, will represent it more implicitly and will probably be defined with respect to the ‘ghettoization’ of the mauritian community based on geography. Mixed environment are not that prevalent: think about it. Personnaly, i have two issues:- we need to make a reform whilst catering for the obvious – communal sensitivities and secondly i dont want a reform to cost a lot..I am taxpayer ! Icing on the cake, i think our legislative representative have too much spare time (approximately 4 months per year..). What i beleive is that the ‘ward/cisconscription’ have to be rationalised. i.e. the size of flacq must be equal to that of port louis say centre..one is nearly 60,000 persons, the other about 40,000. changing the boundary for a more logical representation will help in this process, some basic statistics on sample size will make it…But, will we require to have 40 wards with 120 deputies…No.. 40 wards with 80 deputies…no more..will it work..dunno…

    hmm, maybe i need to do some excel simulation and publish that online…

  11. Avinash Meetoo says

    20 February 2012 at 15:52

    Interesting comment.

    You’re right. There is a need for more rationalised wards (circonscriptions) with similar population sizes. Please do the spreadsheet simulation and publish it.

  12. Ketwaroo D. Yaasir says

    20 February 2012 at 19:44

    I started this : http://www.grandunifyingfragmentsofeverything.org/ a while back but never seem to have had the time to expand on the ideas. still draft in writing, makes perfect sense in my head and would probably scare the shit out of people who are working hard for their pension. and “patriots”. and politicians too. and insurance companies. stock brokers would drop in a coma if it all came to pass. basically everybody with a vested interest in the current system would be against. Your grand kids would be be grateful except kids are such ungrateful brats these days.

    today’s governments and “constitutions” come from eras where people had to rely on top down communication to function in a structure. and there was this sort of educated minority/elite. these days most people are educated. Intelligence is something else though.

  13. Avinash Meetoo says

    20 February 2012 at 19:55

    This is bound to happen one day though. This will piss off all those with vested interests though (as you wrote) :-)

  14. Inf says

    2 March 2012 at 19:26

    Just letting you know, Finland got the same idea as you. You may want to check it out if you are interested:

    http://www.hs.fi/english/article/Workshop+of+volunteers+is+building+a+website+to+facilitate+the+launching+of+citizens%E2%80%99+initiatives+/1329103525835

  15. Biganon says

    19 May 2012 at 17:32

    “Well, if i am not wrong, in Switzerland, direct democracy became a reality after a revolution by the citizens…”

    Switzerland is not a direct democracy.

  16. Avinash Meetoo says

    19 May 2012 at 23:22

    Seems that Switzerland is a direct democracy as citizens can veto any law. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voting_in_Switzerland

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Our Personal Websites

Avinash Meetoo
Christina Meetoo
Anya Meetoo
Kyan Meetoo

You may also like

Default ThumbnailWhat Mauritius can learn from the USA Default ThumbnailA new generation of politicians Default ThumbnailMauritian Obama? Default ThumbnailVote!

Random Posts

Logitech MX Keys and MX Master 3

On recycling old mobile phones

Music I like: Love by Air

Recent Comments

  • Memento Mori by Depeche Mode on My Top 50 Depeche Mode songs
  • Memento Mori by Depeche Mode on I have my dream HiFi setup: Audiolab and Elac
  • Avinash Meetoo on High-End Hi-Fi Audio Companies

Archives

  • March 2023 (5)
  • February 2023 (1)
  • December 2022 (1)
  • November 2022 (1)
  • October 2022 (4)
  • August 2022 (3)
  • July 2022 (3)
  • June 2022 (5)
  • May 2022 (5)
  • January 2022 (3)
  • December 2021 (2)
  • November 2021 (1)
  • October 2021 (1)
  • September 2021 (4)
  • August 2021 (2)
  • July 2021 (14)
  • May 2021 (2)
  • April 2021 (4)
  • March 2021 (9)
  • February 2021 (2)
  • January 2021 (1)
  • October 2020 (1)
  • September 2020 (1)
  • August 2020 (2)
  • July 2020 (5)
  • June 2020 (3)
  • May 2020 (5)
  • April 2020 (6)
  • March 2020 (2)
  • February 2020 (2)
  • January 2020 (2)
  • October 2019 (1)
  • September 2019 (2)
  • July 2019 (2)
  • June 2019 (1)
  • May 2019 (3)
  • April 2019 (2)
  • March 2019 (1)
  • February 2019 (1)
  • January 2019 (3)
  • December 2018 (1)
  • October 2018 (3)
  • August 2018 (2)
  • July 2018 (2)
  • June 2018 (1)
  • May 2018 (1)
  • April 2018 (1)
  • February 2018 (1)
  • December 2017 (1)
  • October 2017 (1)
  • September 2017 (1)
  • August 2017 (1)
  • July 2017 (1)
  • May 2017 (4)
  • April 2017 (3)
  • March 2017 (4)
  • February 2017 (5)
  • January 2017 (3)
  • October 2016 (1)
  • September 2016 (1)
  • August 2016 (4)
  • July 2016 (1)
  • June 2016 (1)
  • March 2016 (3)
  • February 2016 (3)
  • January 2016 (1)
  • December 2015 (1)
  • November 2015 (2)
  • September 2015 (1)
  • August 2015 (3)
  • March 2015 (1)
  • December 2014 (1)
  • November 2014 (4)
  • October 2014 (1)
  • March 2014 (2)
  • February 2014 (3)
  • December 2013 (1)
  • October 2013 (1)
  • September 2013 (1)
  • August 2013 (1)
  • July 2013 (1)
  • June 2013 (2)
  • May 2013 (1)
  • March 2013 (3)
  • January 2013 (2)
  • December 2012 (3)
  • November 2012 (4)
  • September 2012 (3)
  • August 2012 (2)
  • July 2012 (3)
  • June 2012 (2)
  • May 2012 (1)
  • April 2012 (2)
  • February 2012 (1)
  • January 2012 (4)
  • December 2011 (2)
  • November 2011 (1)
  • October 2011 (4)
  • September 2011 (2)
  • August 2011 (1)
  • July 2011 (2)
  • June 2011 (4)
  • April 2011 (7)
  • March 2011 (2)
  • February 2011 (1)
  • January 2011 (3)
  • November 2010 (3)
  • October 2010 (1)
  • September 2010 (2)
  • August 2010 (4)
  • July 2010 (2)
  • June 2010 (1)
  • May 2010 (3)
  • April 2010 (4)
  • March 2010 (3)
  • February 2010 (3)
  • January 2010 (5)
  • December 2009 (2)
  • November 2009 (3)
  • October 2009 (1)
  • September 2009 (5)
  • August 2009 (3)
  • July 2009 (1)
  • June 2009 (3)
  • May 2009 (2)
  • April 2009 (7)
  • March 2009 (12)
  • February 2009 (10)
  • January 2009 (5)
  • December 2008 (4)
  • November 2008 (11)
  • October 2008 (6)
  • September 2008 (7)
  • August 2008 (3)
  • July 2008 (8)
  • June 2008 (6)
  • May 2008 (5)
  • April 2008 (7)
  • March 2008 (6)
  • February 2008 (3)
  • January 2008 (6)
  • December 2007 (11)
  • November 2007 (10)
  • October 2007 (7)
  • September 2007 (9)
  • August 2007 (3)
  • July 2007 (7)
  • June 2007 (8)
  • May 2007 (14)
  • April 2007 (11)
  • March 2007 (18)
  • February 2007 (14)
  • January 2007 (15)
  • December 2006 (16)
  • November 2006 (10)
  • October 2006 (7)
  • September 2006 (8)
  • August 2006 (8)
  • July 2006 (6)
  • June 2006 (4)
  • May 2006 (13)
  • April 2006 (10)
  • March 2006 (11)
  • February 2006 (7)
  • January 2006 (14)
  • December 2005 (8)
  • November 2005 (6)
  • October 2005 (7)
  • September 2005 (2)
  • August 2005 (6)
  • July 2005 (2)
  • June 2005 (6)
  • May 2005 (15)
  • April 2005 (12)
  • March 2005 (3)
  • February 2005 (8)
  • January 2005 (3)
  • December 2004 (1)
  • November 2004 (2)
  • October 2004 (2)
  • September 2004 (3)
  • August 2004 (3)
  • July 2004 (3)
  • June 2004 (3)
  • May 2004 (6)
  • April 2004 (10)
  • March 2004 (12)
Creative Commons License This work is licensed by Avinash Meetoo under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 Unported License.