• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Noulakaz

Noulakaz

The blog of Avinash, Christina, Anya and Kyan Meetoo.

  • Home
  • About
  • People
    • Christina & Avinash Meetoo
    • Avinash Meetoo
    • Christina Meetoo
    • Anya Meetoo
    • Kyan Meetoo
  • General
    • News
    • Mauritius
    • Politics
    • Education
    • Business
    • Travel
  • Computing
    • Apple
    • Linux
    • LUGM
    • Programming
    • Web
    • Technology
    • Knowledge Seven
  • Entertainment
    • Music
    • Movies
    • Photography
    • Sports

Lack of High Definition content in Mauritius

18 May 2010 By Avinash Meetoo 41 Comments

[This December 2009 article is reposted from one of my other blogs which I’ve put in dormant mode for the time being.]

It seems to me that a lot of people in Mauritius will invest in an LCD TV this Christmas (see my recommendations.) But it also seems to me that a lot of people have not really thought about High Definition content or, rather, the lack of it in our country.

Standard television (we use PAL and/or SECAM here) displays 576 lines with an aspect ratio of 4:3. The horizontal resolution being around 720 implies that there are approximately 400,000 dots displayed on a normal TV (I’m simplifying.) This is exactly the number of dots what our local TV broadcaster, MBC, sends us through our antennas (this is true for both analog and digital TV (TNT).) Interestingly, satellite decoders and DVD players also give us 400,000 as both have been designed with standard televisions in mind.

Now, let us put an LCD TV into the equation.

LCD TVs come in two families: Not Full HD (720p) and Full HD (1080p). The difference is the number of dots being displayed onscreen (the resolution.) A Not Full HD TV (which we tend to call HD Ready here in Mauritius even though, technically, a Full HD TV is also HD Ready) has a resolution of 1280 x 720. This is about 900,000 dots and is more than twice the number of dots found on our existing standard televisions. If we climb the ladder to Full HD, we get a resolution of 1920 x 1080, which is more than 2,000,000 dots on screen, which is five times more dots than an standard television.

So this is what we have up to now:

  • Standard TV: 400,000 dots
  • 720p TV: 900,000 dots (2 x)
  • 1080p TV: 2,000,000 dots (5 x)

The point I’m making is that MBC, TNT, Satellite and DVDs only have 400,000 dots and displaying them on LCD TVs full screen requires the television to upscale the image. In simple words, upscaling means creating the missing dots. For example, playing a DVD on a 1080p LCD TV will require the TV to create the missing 2,000,000 – 400,000 = 1,600,000 dots for each image displayed.

Another thing is the refresh rate. Televisions normally display 25 images per second (I’m simplifying.) This means that the above calculation of missing dots will need to be done at the same frequency.

 

Now, think about it. Can you see how much processing power is needed to calculate the missing 1,600,000 dots 25 times a second from what is coming from the DVD player? Can you see how complex this calculation is? And do you understand why the price in LCD TV sets vary so much? Yes, it’s because of the quality and precision of the upscaler. For instance, Sony and Samsung LCD TVs both have a complete PC inside with a powerful processor and which runs the Linux operating system!

In essence, the more you pay for a LCD TV, the better the image will be especially when viewing standard television content (MBC, TNT, Satellite and DVD.)

Note that I’m talking of original DVDs here. The pirated Rs 25 ones have pathetic image quality most of the time. The reason is that originals are generally double layers DVDs and pirated ones single layer i.e. half of the original content is thrown away on pirated copies. Upscalers only work adequately with original DVDs.

A better way to do it

LCD TV are high definition devices and therefore are designed to display high definition content. For instance, let us suppose that we have a device that can send 1920 x 1080 images to the TV directly i.e. the whole 2,000,000 dots. This would make the upscaler useless because the image is already scaled properly. This implies that most LCD TVs, if properly setup, will have similar picture quality (of course, I’m not talking of ultra-cheap gimmicks here.)

But for this to be true we need to have this elusive device that can send Full HD content to the LCD TV. Why elusive? Because, simply speaking, there is not such a thing here. Or, more precisely, the hardware is available but the content is not.

Here are our options here in Mauritius for obtaining High Definition content for our brand new LCD TVs:

  • Blu-Ray – The DVD was designed ten years ago for standard televisions and now has been superseded by Blu-Ray. A Blu-Ray disk has movies encoded at Full HD resolutions i.e. the full 2,000,000 dots 25 times a second. Connecting a Blu-Ray player to the LCD TV using a quality connection (HDMI) means that we can get superb quality images. The major problem in Mauritius is that Blu-Ray disks are not easily available! Shops do not generally sell them and the few I’ve seen are priced out of reach for most of us (like more than Rs 2,000 for one movie.) Blu-Ray disks cannot be copied yet and maybe, ceci explique cela.
  • High Definition Satellite – Canal Satellite offers two channels (Canal+ and TF1) in HD quality in Mauritius (an update: Parabole Maurice has TF1 in HD and DSTV has announced HD channels too.) Or so they say. First of all, the signal is 720p/1080i and not 1080p. So it’s at most 900,000 dots and not the 2,000,000 dots needed on Full HD screens. Secondly, it seems to me that the image quality is poor compared to Blu-Ray. Maybe the reason is that we are only getting low bitrate signals (I not done any scientific tests myself.) Bitrate is a measure of the amount of information being sent per second, Blu-Ray is about 2.5 megabyte per second (5 mbps max!) In France, Canal+ has an average bitrate of 1 megabyte per second (see this) and I would not be surprised if we are getting half of that bitrate in Mauritius for keeping costs down. In other words, Canal+ HD and TF1 HD are not really HD. At least, not here in Mauritius.
  • Downloadable content – Everyone I know (except for the very young or the very old) download films in DivX format which play fine on standard televisions. Downloading High Definition movies is something else. A  one and a half hour movie is 5400 seconds and therefore holds on 5400 megabytes (at the acceptable but not Blu-Ray quality of 1 megabyte per second.) This is more than 5 gigabytes for one film! If one has a steady 512kbit/s Internet connection, 24 hours are needed to download this movie. If one wants to have Blu-Ray quality, then two and a half days are needed! So, even though it is technically possible to download HD content, it will take ages. (an update: I’ve tested a few movies at lower bitrates and they are watchable but you need to count, at least, 3.5-4 Gb for a good picture.)
  • High definition game consoles – Both the Sony PlayStation 3 and the Microsoft Xbox 360 are HD. Games run in HD but are priced out of reach for most of us (more than Rs 2000 for a game.) The PlayStation 3 is a Blu-Ray player too. But once more, Blu-Ray disks are not readily available in Mauritius.

Concluding note

A lot of people I know are considering to get an LCD TV. But buying a TV to use it suboptimally is not a great idea. The problem is that we do not have access to High Definition content in Mauritius.

Who has a solution?

Filed Under: Mauritius, Movies, News, Technology

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. mahen says

    18 May 2010 at 17:02

    This may be a solution: http://www.blogsdna.com/10249/googles-smart-tv-can-come-to-reality-this-week.htm

    Google Smart TV

    Plus i think Parabol Maurice and Canal Satelite already provides content in HD

  2. avinash says

    18 May 2010 at 17:32

    @Mahen

    In the post, I mentioned that we already have TF1 and Canal+ in HD here. But what about the bitrate? Has someone done some tests? On Parabole, for instance, some channels look very blocky which is a sign that the MPEG2 stream has a low bitrate. How can one recognise low bitrate artifacts in a H264 stream?

    As for the Google Smart TV, we still have a long way to go… as far as payment is concerned. The problem is not a technical problem (we do have a 2Mbit/s network here in Mauritius) but more of a commercial problem: how are people going to pay? And how much?

  3. Sailesh says

    18 May 2010 at 17:39

    Hi avinash,
    Great article.
    Indeed, HD channels broadcasted in mauritius by canalsat are only 720p
    also, canalsat has 3 HD channels, canal+ , canal+ sport & TF1 :)

    check :

    http://www.canalsat-maurice.com/index.php?id=1432

  4. avinash says

    18 May 2010 at 17:40

    Thanks @Sailesh for pointing this out.

  5. Haresh Vyas says

    19 May 2010 at 15:21

    Hi
    First time i been to your blog, very interesting, please keep it up.
    About HD or HD ready, what is use of more dots if content is poor, first of all the quality of content should be improved.

  6. avinash says

    19 May 2010 at 16:10

    I’ve just come across this formidable article on Gizmodo:

    http://gizmodo.com/5541957/display-myths-shattered-how-monitor-companies-cook-their-specs

  7. BlueBerry says

    23 May 2010 at 12:35

    The only problem is with the pricing & the cost of disctributing HD content, whether it is with the MBC (which I do not see in the foreseeable future), Parabole maurice or Canal Satellite.

  8. avinash says

    23 May 2010 at 12:52

    This is one major problem, @BlueBerry.

    The second major one is the fact that only one satellite sends signals from Europe to Mauritius thereby greatly limiting the bandwidth available hence the number of channels. And there are some other points in that other article I wrote: https://www.noulakaz.net/2008/09/29/parabole-and-canal-sat-to-merge-in-mauritius/

  9. Stephen Naicken says

    25 May 2010 at 02:38

    Off the top of my head, a DVB-S transponder is 24Mbps and DVBS2 is 2x24Mbps. The problem is not satellite capacity as such (it is there if the provider wants it, just pay for more transponders from Eutelsat), more that DVB-S2 is not used and CanalSat and Parabole transmit many channels on each transponder, hence the low bitrate.

    As Avinash rightly pointed out with Google TV it’s about the economics and given the economics of satellite TV in the Indian Ocean region, it’s either choice or quality. The solution is to increase the cost, but the average customer would be displeased by that. HD LCD TVs are not mainstream yet.

    @BlueBerry MBC has a presence on satellite, it is used to relay images to Rodrigues I believe. From what I read there were plans to move to 16e which is used for Canal and Parabole.

    If you want to collect statistics on the bitrates for the channels, you’ll need a DVB-S/S2 satellite card and software such as TSreader or dvbsnoop.

  10. avinash says

    25 May 2010 at 06:53

    Thanks for this insightful comment, @Stephen.

    As far as I know, Eutelsat W2A is used to send us Parabole Maurice and CanalSat signals. As quoted from the website:

    Up to 15 Ku-band transponders are connected to a second beam serving southern Africa and Indian Ocean islands, and enabling connectivity between Africa and Europe.

    It seems that one Ku-band has 27 MHz in bandwidth. How many Mbit/s is that?

  11. Stephen Naicken says

    25 May 2010 at 13:42

    Looking at Lyngsat, Parabole use two transponders on Eutelsat W2M (http://www.lyngsat.com/packages/parabole.html). Each transponder uses FEC 3/4, 29950 SR and I would be very surprised if not QSPK. Using the calculator here: http://www.satellite-calculations.com/Satellite/bitrates.htm, we have:

    i) Allocated Bandwidth 26MHz, DVB-S QPSK 3/4: 28.07904328 Mbps (Netto) / 30.46874909 Mbps (Reed)

    ii) SR 29.950, DVB-S QPSK 3/4: 41.40146936 Mbps (Netto)/44.92499866 Mbps (Reed)

    Assuming (ii) is a good enough approximation, that’s comparable to transponder bandwidth used by European providers, but the number of services on a transponder is higher, 22 TV channels on 11492 H. Ignoring radio and data services, we have an average of 2Mbps for a TV channel (over-estimate).

  12. avinash says

    25 May 2010 at 22:11

    Thanks @Stephen.

    Are you speaking of 2Mbit/s or 2Mbytes/s? In France, Canal+ HD is broadcasted at around 2Mbytes/s.

  13. JoKi says

    2 June 2010 at 02:28

    Hi, interesting article,

    according to HDTV via Satellite… DStv provides several HD channels for southern africa. And honestly, I am looking forward to the World Cup in high definition.

    Sincerely, JoKi

  14. avinash says

    2 June 2010 at 06:18

    Me too. In fact, I have Parabole and I’ve subscribed to TF1 HD.

  15. Stephen says

    3 June 2010 at 18:43

    For Canal+ HD on Astra 19.2E – initial transponder DVB-S2 12522000 V 22000000 2/3 AUTO AUTO. Five samples.

    packets read: 4/(357916) d_time: 0.001 s = 6016.000 kbit/s (Avrg: 9264.839 kbit/s) [bad: 0]

    packets read: 2/(304095) d_time: 0.001 s = 3008.000 kbit/s (Avrg: 7990.337 kbit/s) [bad: 0]

    packets read: 7/(261996) d_time: 0.001 s = 10528.000 kbit/s (Avrg: 6855.408 kbit/s) [bad: 0]

    packets read: 16/(362056) d_time: 0.002 s = 12032.000 kbit/s (Avrg: 9417.714 kbit/s) [bad: 0]

    packets read: 5/(247941) d_time: 0.001 s = 7520.000 kbit/s (Avrg: 6654.709 kbit/s) [bad: 0]

    Calculations in post above would be Megabits per second. I’ll pull some Canal+ SD stats later, but I would hazard a guess at half of the HD rate.

  16. avinash says

    4 June 2010 at 16:47

    @Stephen

    On average, that would be around 7-8 megabits/s which is 1 megabyte/s which is (more or less) the same as in France. That’s not bad at all.

    I wonder what the bitrate is on Parabole’s TF1 HD.

  17. Stephen says

    4 June 2010 at 17:15

    That’s the European version, I can get any stats on the Madagascar beam used to broadcast to Mauritius unfortunately.

    Just something that I though you and your readers would like to know, the FIFA World Cup feed to Europe is 55 Mbits/s ;)

  18. avinash says

    4 June 2010 at 17:47

    Lucky you :-)

  19. YNK FC says

    26 June 2010 at 17:05

    I would like to comment on the HD downloadable content. Breakthroughs have been made by movie encoders on warez forums… Blu Ray films are available in only 900mb, but it is encoded in a new format called matrovska or .MKV , with the quality unchanged! Very very few dvd players support this format, so you have to connect your PC to your LCD to be able to play these movies (here, it’s very practical to have a laptop with a good GPU and preferably an HDMI output)… A 900mb movie can be downloaded in only 5 hours with a 512 kbps connection…

    The container format MKV is superior to AVI in many ways:

    * supports H.264/AVC
    * B-Frame support
    * supports variable audio bitrate
    * supports chapters, muxed subtitles, metadata/tags and dvd-like menus
    * MKV movie is roughly half in size when compared to AVI

    I personally prefer the 720p MKV encodes @ only 500mb, and nearly same quality as 1080p encodes! So I get a movie in only 2.5 hours!

    Cheers!

  20. avinash says

    26 June 2010 at 19:14

    Thanks for the comment.

    Strictly speaking, MKV is not a codec. It’s a container. In fact, I routinely use the M2TS container with H264 video and Dolby Digital 5.1 audio when watching HD movies with my PS3.

  21. YNK FC says

    26 June 2010 at 20:00

    I just wanted to point out that there are plenty of MKV HD movies on warez forums, at a very small size, and with most features of Blu ray iso…

  22. Manu says

    13 July 2010 at 20:05

    Hi,
    I was looking for places where blu ray movies are being sold in Mauritius and came across your blog after some ‘Googling’. It’s nice to see that there are some people who are very knowledgeable on technical matters relative to HD materials and the like. I also found your blog to be professionally designed and commendable.

    As for me, I am mostly a movie lover and my present interest is 1080p movies. Unfortunately the blu ray originals are really out of reach. It appears that blu ray movies, as opposed to PS3 games, can be copied on blank 25GB disks. Do you know other places where such blu-ray copies are sold?

  23. avinash says

    13 July 2010 at 20:15

    Hi @Manu

    Yeah, I’ve found the Blu-Rays to be prohibitively expensive here as compared to the prices in Europe, say (someone told me that Avatar was being sold in Rose-Hill at Rs 2700!) I don’t know where copies of Blu-Ray disks are sold though. I tend to download movies though (either SD or HD) and play them using my PS3. The image quality is good enough for me…

  24. YNK FC says

    14 July 2010 at 09:27

    @Manu…use my technique, download the movies in MKV format, then connect your PC to your LCD….enjoy the movies! Just watched Clash of the Titans (1080p) @ 650mb….

    Have a look at these screenshots from an encoded version of Avatar (2009) 864p BRRip, but @ 1.5GB (still better than 25 GB :lol:)

    http://www.shaanig.com/showthread.php?159-Avatar-(2009)-864p-BRRip-1536×864-1.5GB-ShAaNiG

  25. Romeo says

    28 August 2010 at 23:58

    The HD ready is not suitable for some satellite channels. I’ve seen a Philips in Rose Hill at Rs @18000 Full HD. I think i take it tomorrow.

  26. avinash says

    29 August 2010 at 00:14

    Satellite channels are not Full HD 1080p. They are 720p / 1080i… so an HD Ready TV is good enough. In fact, studies show that we, humans, cannot distinguish between 720p and 1080p content on a 40″ TV at normal viewing distance…

  27. Vik says

    4 September 2010 at 13:21

    Hi Guys,

    Seems like the older posts on this blog have been deleted.
    Can someone please give me the name of the computer store in Port Louis which sells BLurays -the copied ones.
    Thanks a ton.
    Have a great weekend..

  28. avinash says

    5 September 2010 at 10:23

    I don’t think any comment was deleted. Maybe no one gave the name of that store.

  29. Vik says

    5 September 2010 at 17:27

    Hey Avinash,

    I guess I got the wrong blog…but it was on ur blog page …I remember somewhere around Feb 2010 we were having a discussion on places to buy BDs in Mauritius. It was in a blog about HD content in Mauritius . Someone had written about a shop in P.Louis which sold BDs copied for 150-250 Mur.
    Unfortunately, I dont have the name written as I thought these blogs usually store infos..but sadly, that entire topics gone missing… I remember we were posting around Christmas time last year which followed until Feb, thats when I left for Australia..
    And I m back in the island, and need to buy some more BDs here…
    So pls, If u do seem to recall bout the store somewhere near China town..do write the name.

    Thanks..
    Cheers

  30. avinash says

    6 September 2010 at 09:08

    Anyone?

  31. Vik says

    6 September 2010 at 13:47

    No Worries Avinash,
    Thanks for trying… Would you know if Media players are sold anywhere in Mauritius? The ones that can play MKV files?

    Thanks..

  32. avinash says

    6 September 2010 at 14:08

    In Mauritius?

    I use a PS3 which works really well with AVI, MP4 and M2TS containers. You can always extract the audio and video streams from the MKV and put them in a M2TS file, say, without reencoding anything. I did that once or twice and the PS3 shows everything nicely…

  33. YNK FC says

    6 September 2010 at 14:17

    Media players capable of handling MKV are not sold in Mauritius… But they do exist… http://www.slashgear.com/wd-tv-media-player-does-1080p-and-plays-mkv-0321235/

    I think it’s cheap @ $150… http://www.wdc.com/en/products/Products.asp?DriveID=832

  34. avinash says

    6 September 2010 at 17:48

    Yes. I second that. The Western Digital WD TV Live Plus is one of the best devices to play HD video but it’s not available in Mauritius! Maybe I’ll have my own store in the future :-)

  35. indoo kamalduth says

    17 December 2010 at 11:08

    dear ,sir
    indeed ,great article.thus i’m willing to buy the new LG led tv 32LE5300. what are the advise……

  36. avinash says

    17 December 2010 at 20:19

    Hi @Indoo.

    The LG 32LE5300 is a great TV but don’t get too excited with LED at 32″ (the effect is much more noticeable on much larger sets.)

    Have a look at the Sony KLV-32EX400 and Philips 32PFL3605. They are cheaper than the LG.

    To be honest, all LCD TV of that price range have the same potential image quality. You need to feed them HD content and make sure that they are properly calibrated.

  37. avinash says

    17 December 2010 at 20:21

    By the way, I nearly forgot:

    ThreeBags, my recommendation website on technology products (including, of course, LCD TV) is being revamped right now. Expect reviews of some of those new models during the week-end.

    Don’t hesitate to share ThreeBags with your friends and acquaintances.

  38. Vito says

    25 April 2011 at 07:12

    Hi Avinash,

    just came across your great blog article after doing a search for BLU Ray products in Mauritius. I currently have a SONY DVD player that doesn’t play mp4 nor H.264. After copying a DVD with mp4 files it didn’t work in my SONY DVD player because they don’t have those codecs/linceces installed – its already to old… Then i tried my Encore media box, its 2 years old – just to old to enjoy this type of media. Xbox won’t play usb sticks with copied movies nor copied DVDs. I went to Jacey and saw that they have an ASUS media box for above Rs.5000 with HDMI connection that plays such files. I think in the end, constantly buying and upgrading equipments costs more than just buying a good graphic card with HDMI connection and connecting it to the computer. Here you can stay upto date with downloading codecs and the movie players that you can use are numerous. So I agree with YNK FC solution suggested to for example downlod matroska files and just run them from the computer and connecting it to the TV… IF, now I am saying IForiginal BLU RAYS and DVDs would have a special pricing for countries like Mauritius I would have bought them always ORIZINAL! :) but they are out of reach… Do you think a graphic card for a PC will have the power required to play smoothly a blu ray .mkv packaged movie on a +40 inch HD Sony Bravia ?

  39. Avinash Meetoo says

    25 April 2011 at 12:37

    You’re right. A good home cinema PC is a good solution. Personally I use a
    PS3 as media center and I keep all my files on a NAS.

  40. Bhavish Bhim says

    19 November 2013 at 10:38

    i think the technology that canal+ uses to trasmit these images are in true definition that is 1080P. i havent install canal sat at my place and it is too costly but i am satisfies with all images that canalsat uses to transmit imags.. i think this technology of Full HD that is 1080p should be launched in MBC for better image..

  41. Avinash Meetoo says

    19 November 2013 at 11:14

    CanalSat transmits a 1080i signal (which is slightly worse than true 1080p) but it’s good enough for the majority of us.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Our Personal Websites

Avinash Meetoo
Christina Meetoo
Anya Meetoo
Kyan Meetoo

Related Posts

  • No HD for Euro 2012 matches on CanalSat
  • Parabole and Canal Sat to merge in Mauritius
  • My next LCD TV, possibly?
  • A Home Cinema in Mauritius (part 5)

Random Posts

  • Kwang Poon talks about Mauritian weblogs
  • Bravo Kyan for your fantastic SC results
  • My 20 essential Google Chrome extensions
  • My music studio

Archives

  • May 2025 (2)
  • April 2025 (4)
  • January 2025 (3)
  • December 2024 (2)
  • November 2024 (2)
  • October 2024 (3)
  • September 2024 (7)
  • August 2024 (1)
  • July 2024 (1)
  • June 2024 (2)
  • May 2024 (3)
  • January 2024 (2)
  • December 2023 (1)
  • October 2023 (1)
  • September 2023 (4)
  • August 2023 (3)
  • July 2023 (1)
  • June 2023 (4)
  • May 2023 (1)
  • April 2023 (1)
  • March 2023 (5)
  • February 2023 (1)
  • December 2022 (1)
  • November 2022 (1)
  • October 2022 (4)
  • August 2022 (4)
  • July 2022 (3)
  • June 2022 (5)
  • May 2022 (5)
  • January 2022 (3)
  • December 2021 (2)
  • November 2021 (1)
  • October 2021 (1)
  • September 2021 (4)
  • August 2021 (2)
  • July 2021 (14)
  • May 2021 (2)
  • April 2021 (4)
  • March 2021 (9)
  • February 2021 (2)
  • January 2021 (1)
  • October 2020 (1)
  • September 2020 (1)
  • August 2020 (2)
  • July 2020 (5)
  • June 2020 (3)
  • May 2020 (5)
  • April 2020 (6)
  • March 2020 (2)
  • February 2020 (2)
  • January 2020 (2)
  • October 2019 (1)
  • September 2019 (2)
  • July 2019 (2)
  • June 2019 (1)
  • May 2019 (3)
  • April 2019 (2)
  • March 2019 (1)
  • February 2019 (1)
  • January 2019 (3)
  • December 2018 (1)
  • October 2018 (3)
  • August 2018 (2)
  • July 2018 (2)
  • June 2018 (1)
  • May 2018 (2)
  • April 2018 (1)
  • February 2018 (1)
  • December 2017 (1)
  • October 2017 (1)
  • September 2017 (1)
  • August 2017 (1)
  • July 2017 (1)
  • May 2017 (4)
  • April 2017 (3)
  • March 2017 (4)
  • February 2017 (5)
  • January 2017 (3)
  • October 2016 (1)
  • September 2016 (1)
  • August 2016 (4)
  • July 2016 (1)
  • June 2016 (1)
  • March 2016 (3)
  • February 2016 (3)
  • January 2016 (1)
  • December 2015 (1)
  • November 2015 (2)
  • September 2015 (1)
  • August 2015 (3)
  • March 2015 (1)
  • December 2014 (1)
  • November 2014 (4)
  • October 2014 (1)
  • March 2014 (2)
  • February 2014 (3)
  • December 2013 (1)
  • October 2013 (1)
  • September 2013 (1)
  • August 2013 (1)
  • July 2013 (1)
  • June 2013 (2)
  • May 2013 (1)
  • March 2013 (3)
  • January 2013 (2)
  • December 2012 (3)
  • November 2012 (4)
  • September 2012 (3)
  • August 2012 (2)
  • July 2012 (3)
  • June 2012 (2)
  • May 2012 (1)
  • April 2012 (2)
  • February 2012 (1)
  • January 2012 (4)
  • December 2011 (2)
  • November 2011 (1)
  • October 2011 (4)
  • September 2011 (2)
  • August 2011 (1)
  • July 2011 (2)
  • June 2011 (4)
  • April 2011 (7)
  • March 2011 (2)
  • February 2011 (1)
  • January 2011 (3)
  • November 2010 (3)
  • October 2010 (1)
  • September 2010 (2)
  • August 2010 (4)
  • July 2010 (2)
  • June 2010 (1)
  • May 2010 (3)
  • April 2010 (4)
  • March 2010 (3)
  • February 2010 (3)
  • January 2010 (5)
  • December 2009 (2)
  • November 2009 (3)
  • October 2009 (1)
  • September 2009 (5)
  • August 2009 (3)
  • July 2009 (1)
  • June 2009 (3)
  • May 2009 (2)
  • April 2009 (7)
  • March 2009 (12)
  • February 2009 (10)
  • January 2009 (5)
  • December 2008 (4)
  • November 2008 (11)
  • October 2008 (6)
  • September 2008 (7)
  • August 2008 (3)
  • July 2008 (8)
  • June 2008 (6)
  • May 2008 (5)
  • April 2008 (7)
  • March 2008 (6)
  • February 2008 (3)
  • January 2008 (6)
  • December 2007 (11)
  • November 2007 (10)
  • October 2007 (7)
  • September 2007 (9)
  • August 2007 (3)
  • July 2007 (7)
  • June 2007 (8)
  • May 2007 (14)
  • April 2007 (11)
  • March 2007 (18)
  • February 2007 (14)
  • January 2007 (15)
  • December 2006 (16)
  • November 2006 (10)
  • October 2006 (7)
  • September 2006 (8)
  • August 2006 (8)
  • July 2006 (6)
  • June 2006 (4)
  • May 2006 (13)
  • April 2006 (10)
  • March 2006 (11)
  • February 2006 (7)
  • January 2006 (14)
  • December 2005 (8)
  • November 2005 (6)
  • October 2005 (7)
  • September 2005 (2)
  • August 2005 (6)
  • July 2005 (2)
  • June 2005 (6)
  • May 2005 (15)
  • April 2005 (12)
  • March 2005 (3)
  • February 2005 (8)
  • January 2005 (3)
  • December 2004 (1)
  • November 2004 (2)
  • October 2004 (2)
  • September 2004 (3)
  • August 2004 (3)
  • July 2004 (3)
  • June 2004 (3)
  • May 2004 (6)
  • April 2004 (10)
  • March 2004 (12)
Creative Commons License This work is licensed by Avinash Meetoo under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 Unported License.