<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lexpress.mu is not working well&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.noulakaz.net/weblog/2008/12/01/lexpressmu-is-not-working-well/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.noulakaz.net/weblog/2008/12/01/lexpressmu-is-not-working-well/</link>
	<description>My opinion on Teaching, Programming, Technology and Web 2.0 in Mauritius</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 03:05:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: avinash</title>
		<link>http://www.noulakaz.net/weblog/2008/12/01/lexpressmu-is-not-working-well/#comment-202266</link>
		<dc:creator>avinash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 03:27:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noulakaz.net/weblog/?p=1089#comment-202266</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the info. It seems that Google now can &quot;see&quot; the text within flash files. Personally, I believe the next generation of website will be done with HTML5, CSS and Javascript. By the way, YouTube has a non-Flash version now, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/html5&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.youtube.com/html5&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the info. It seems that Google now can &#8220;see&#8221; the text within flash files. Personally, I believe the next generation of website will be done with HTML5, CSS and Javascript. By the way, YouTube has a non-Flash version now, <a href="http://www.youtube.com/html5" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/html5</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: King_Trojan</title>
		<link>http://www.noulakaz.net/weblog/2008/12/01/lexpressmu-is-not-working-well/#comment-202258</link>
		<dc:creator>King_Trojan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 02:45:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noulakaz.net/weblog/?p=1089#comment-202258</guid>
		<description>&quot; Furthermore, Flash and Google are not really good friends…  &quot; 

http://news.cnet.com/8301-13530_3-9844989-28.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8221; Furthermore, Flash and Google are not really good friends…  &#8221; </p>
<p><a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13530_3-9844989-28.html" rel="nofollow">http://news.cnet.com/8301-13530_3-9844989-28.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: avinash</title>
		<link>http://www.noulakaz.net/weblog/2008/12/01/lexpressmu-is-not-working-well/#comment-189177</link>
		<dc:creator>avinash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 05:54:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noulakaz.net/weblog/?p=1089#comment-189177</guid>
		<description>How do you know that? And, if confirmed, does L&#039;Express.mu explicitly say they&#039;ll do that for some comments (in an EULA or something)? Or else, this feels like censorship.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do you know that? And, if confirmed, does L&#8217;Express.mu explicitly say they&#8217;ll do that for some comments (in an EULA or something)? Or else, this feels like censorship.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: long</title>
		<link>http://www.noulakaz.net/weblog/2008/12/01/lexpressmu-is-not-working-well/#comment-189124</link>
		<dc:creator>long</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 15:36:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noulakaz.net/weblog/?p=1089#comment-189124</guid>
		<description>On  politics the messages are filtered ,if you are pro l&#039;express then the message is shown on the net immedaitely , if you are against l&#039;express views then 90% you message wil not be posted</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On  politics the messages are filtered ,if you are pro l&#8217;express then the message is shown on the net immedaitely , if you are against l&#8217;express views then 90% you message wil not be posted</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Olivier</title>
		<link>http://www.noulakaz.net/weblog/2008/12/01/lexpressmu-is-not-working-well/#comment-181857</link>
		<dc:creator>Olivier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 04:54:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noulakaz.net/weblog/?p=1089#comment-181857</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a bit late to the party.

I haven&#039;t visited avinash&#039;s blog in a long time.

eddy - each request opening a connection to the db? that&#039;s awful for any application that opens network sockets. There is a hard limit on the number of open sockets. The common solution is a connection pool.

Any decent server accepting a high number of connections needs to be concurrent, that is a given... threading vs forking? Forking is very decent on POSIX systems with copy-on-write. I&#039;m not sure about forking windows or windows server.

This isn&#039;t intended as a display of geek macho-ness. take the remarks as coming from a friend to another friend. This might come in handy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a bit late to the party.</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t visited avinash&#8217;s blog in a long time.</p>
<p>eddy &#8211; each request opening a connection to the db? that&#8217;s awful for any application that opens network sockets. There is a hard limit on the number of open sockets. The common solution is a connection pool.</p>
<p>Any decent server accepting a high number of connections needs to be concurrent, that is a given&#8230; threading vs forking? Forking is very decent on POSIX systems with copy-on-write. I&#8217;m not sure about forking windows or windows server.</p>
<p>This isn&#8217;t intended as a display of geek macho-ness. take the remarks as coming from a friend to another friend. This might come in handy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Akash</title>
		<link>http://www.noulakaz.net/weblog/2008/12/01/lexpressmu-is-not-working-well/#comment-170355</link>
		<dc:creator>Akash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 22:32:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noulakaz.net/weblog/?p=1089#comment-170355</guid>
		<description>Hey check out the new Football Prediction Competition: www.defimedia.info/football

Winner of the month gets a gift! Register now! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey check out the new Football Prediction Competition: <a href="http://www.defimedia.info/football" rel="nofollow">http://www.defimedia.info/football</a></p>
<p>Winner of the month gets a gift! Register now! <img src='http://www.noulakaz.net/weblog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vishal coodye</title>
		<link>http://www.noulakaz.net/weblog/2008/12/01/lexpressmu-is-not-working-well/#comment-170190</link>
		<dc:creator>vishal coodye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 07:10:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noulakaz.net/weblog/?p=1089#comment-170190</guid>
		<description>Hi Guys,

This is Vishal.  Let&#039;s be on the same wavelength that afterall a website is a central focus of all business in the world of today. As Ashwin illustrated very well, WE CANNOT FAIL.  Being a web analyst for almost 10 years now, one thing I&#039;ve learnt is that a business/media website should be extremely accessible to the broad public, be in whatever commercial fields you are.  If I were to comment on l&#039;express website I would certify the followings;

L&#039;express website is a great website because it has enormous amount of hits. People must not forget that we are here dealing with a highly praised media platform.  In summary, the failure of L&#039;express website is due to a wrong concept.  We must not forget that in India we have loads of programmers who does website and trust me, YOU CAN FIND MUCH BETTER WEBSITE DEVELOPERS IN MAURITIUS.  It may sound superficial, but trust me I&#039;ve seen great web artists out there right in Mauritius who have been my student once.  I don&#039;t say am the best but at least I know what would be best and definitely what would be the fallback to bring L&#039;express website back ontrack. DO NOT UNDERESIMATE THE IMPORTANCE OF LOCAL KNOWHOW... WHEN IT&#039;S RIGHT TO YOUR DOORSTEP SMILING AT YOU!.

VC. For Web Analyst.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Guys,</p>
<p>This is Vishal.  Let&#8217;s be on the same wavelength that afterall a website is a central focus of all business in the world of today. As Ashwin illustrated very well, WE CANNOT FAIL.  Being a web analyst for almost 10 years now, one thing I&#8217;ve learnt is that a business/media website should be extremely accessible to the broad public, be in whatever commercial fields you are.  If I were to comment on l&#8217;express website I would certify the followings;</p>
<p>L&#8217;express website is a great website because it has enormous amount of hits. People must not forget that we are here dealing with a highly praised media platform.  In summary, the failure of L&#8217;express website is due to a wrong concept.  We must not forget that in India we have loads of programmers who does website and trust me, YOU CAN FIND MUCH BETTER WEBSITE DEVELOPERS IN MAURITIUS.  It may sound superficial, but trust me I&#8217;ve seen great web artists out there right in Mauritius who have been my student once.  I don&#8217;t say am the best but at least I know what would be best and definitely what would be the fallback to bring L&#8217;express website back ontrack. DO NOT UNDERESIMATE THE IMPORTANCE OF LOCAL KNOWHOW&#8230; WHEN IT&#8217;S RIGHT TO YOUR DOORSTEP SMILING AT YOU!.</p>
<p>VC. For Web Analyst.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aboo Bolaky</title>
		<link>http://www.noulakaz.net/weblog/2008/12/01/lexpressmu-is-not-working-well/#comment-168173</link>
		<dc:creator>Aboo Bolaky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 13:45:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noulakaz.net/weblog/?p=1089#comment-168173</guid>
		<description>The ego of programmers...this is a hugely debatable issue..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The ego of programmers&#8230;this is a hugely debatable issue..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eddy Young</title>
		<link>http://www.noulakaz.net/weblog/2008/12/01/lexpressmu-is-not-working-well/#comment-167117</link>
		<dc:creator>Eddy Young</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 08:46:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noulakaz.net/weblog/?p=1089#comment-167117</guid>
		<description>&quot;But that is not what I was referring to (I didn’t mention AdSense.)&quot;

I brought AdSense into the picture to expand on the point I was making that Google derives more value from sites that it indexes more than it adds to them.

&quot;Incidentally, I believe that using AdSense instead of developing your own advertisement engine is not a bad idea… money-wise. I may be wrong though.&quot;

If you are in the business of advertising, you want to serve ads (just like Google does witth AdSense) not consume them (as you do when publishing AdSense banners). 

Now, if you are a publisher (and not an advertiser) and want to monetize on the side, Google AdSense makes, err, sense.

Eddy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;But that is not what I was referring to (I didn’t mention AdSense.)&#8221;</p>
<p>I brought AdSense into the picture to expand on the point I was making that Google derives more value from sites that it indexes more than it adds to them.</p>
<p>&#8220;Incidentally, I believe that using AdSense instead of developing your own advertisement engine is not a bad idea… money-wise. I may be wrong though.&#8221;</p>
<p>If you are in the business of advertising, you want to serve ads (just like Google does witth AdSense) not consume them (as you do when publishing AdSense banners). </p>
<p>Now, if you are a publisher (and not an advertiser) and want to monetize on the side, Google AdSense makes, err, sense.</p>
<p>Eddy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: avinash</title>
		<link>http://www.noulakaz.net/weblog/2008/12/01/lexpressmu-is-not-working-well/#comment-167091</link>
		<dc:creator>avinash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 04:53:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noulakaz.net/weblog/?p=1089#comment-167091</guid>
		<description>You are right, Eddy. L&#039;Express runs its own advertisements.

But that is not what I was referring to (I didn&#039;t mention AdSense.) I find it bizarre for L&#039;Express to destroy the hundreds of pages it had previously. Now, if this has been done purposely, then why not? But (as you mentioned), this seems to have been done &quot;unintentionally&quot; (I would have used another word...) and this is bound to have a consequence on the website&#039;s Google (and Yahoo! and Live etc.) ranking and, hence, its visibility as most people I know use search engines.

As I wrote above, personally, I would have kept the &quot;old&quot; (but still very valuable) pages around.

Incidentally, I believe that using AdSense instead of developing your own advertisement engine is not a bad idea... money-wise. I may be wrong though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are right, Eddy. L&#8217;Express runs its own advertisements.</p>
<p>But that is not what I was referring to (I didn&#8217;t mention AdSense.) I find it bizarre for L&#8217;Express to destroy the hundreds of pages it had previously. Now, if this has been done purposely, then why not? But (as you mentioned), this seems to have been done &#8220;unintentionally&#8221; (I would have used another word&#8230;) and this is bound to have a consequence on the website&#8217;s Google (and Yahoo! and Live etc.) ranking and, hence, its visibility as most people I know use search engines.</p>
<p>As I wrote above, personally, I would have kept the &#8220;old&#8221; (but still very valuable) pages around.</p>
<p>Incidentally, I believe that using AdSense instead of developing your own advertisement engine is not a bad idea&#8230; money-wise. I may be wrong though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
